Even in the middle of the 21st century when the average life expectancy in developed countries is over 90 years and centenarians are everywhere 15 years is still a long time The problem is that 15 years is a very short time to build a strong army Although the US Army has taken into account the threat of a world war when formulating its reform plan that is its military modernization development plan due to various practical factors the interactive whiteboard for schools development time set is still 20 years not 15 years Objectively speaking this is also in line with the actual situation that is the average construction period of the A the replacement of the old and the new in such a short time
In any case the modernization reform of the US Army must abide by the objective law of development of things In fact the US Army lace Army have had nothing to do with the United States Not to mention the age of cold l and financial resources in the period of exploring the reform of the army They can enjoy the success of the reform of European countries 4k smart board and then use their strong basic strength to surpass their competitors For example the British invented the tank Germany carried it forward and the Soviet Union pushed the tank to its peak As a result in the Gulf War of the 1990s the US Army equipped with M1 easily defeated the Iraqi Army equipped with T72 making the US tank a new vane Standard equipment on
M1 such as 120 mm smooth-bore gun gas turbine welded armor tail ammunition compartment depleted uranium alloy armor and armor-piercin e can find that as long as we find the right direction of development that is set the goal the United States can use its strong basic strength to make the Army surpass its opponents in a very short time touch screen interactive whiteboard Still in terms of tanks before M1 M60 and M48 were not as good as the Soviet Union's contemporary T62 and T55 (which had been confirmed in the Middle East War and the Iran-Iraq War) while M1 could surpass the contemporary T72 at one stroke even more advanced than T80 and T90 and the strong basic strength of the United States In particular the strength in scientific research is closely related
The key is that since 2013 the leading edge of the United States in basic strength has begun to decline In the final analysis there is only one reasoields even in some exclusive high-tech fields such as in the electronic field represented by 75 inch smart board computer chips not only transistor technology was born in the United States but also before the beginning of the 21st century Even Japan which is close behind can hardly match it With the advent of room-temperature superconducting technology the advantages of the United States in the field of electronics have disappeared especially in new fields such as neural network computers and quantum computers the United States not only has no advantages but is at an absolute disadvantage which makes the US authorities have to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in related fields
For the US Army the impact of this backwardness in basic technology is even more obvious More importantly in the case of losing the "advantage of backwardness" the US Army has remained self-confident for 30 years and has not 75 smart board made any adjustments to its development model It can be said that in the past few local wars the main reason for the successive defeats of the US Army was complacency Had it not been for the fact that "a lean camel is bigger than a horse" the United States would still have a strong comprehensive national strength and would have been able to survive for decades and I am afraid that before the outbreak of World War III the United States Army would have been reduced to a second-rate regiment Anyway better late than never After suffering a crushing defeat in the Middle East War in 2041 the US Army finally woke up recognized the huge gap with the Republican Army and set a 20-year development plan Admittedly as a nation founded by exiles explorers and bankrupts the United States is very good at learning from its failures
When formulating the development plan the US Army not only put forward a very clear purpose but also made a detailed plan to achieve the purpose Whether it is the actual system or traditional smartboards for business habits Americans are very good at making plans and they are very detailed According to the relevant report submitted by the US Army to Congress in 2042 the development plan details the progress of the Army's modernization construction to each quarter and even makes a detailed plan for which projects should be launched each month and in which month each project should reach a certain stage and also makes a detailed demonstration of the feasibility of the plan It has to be said that this is the characteristic of the "American plan" Anyone who knows the United States should know that the development plan of the United States Army will certainly not be realized at least not according to the planned schedule We should know that in the past hundred years the various services and arms of the United States have put forward dozens of similar development plans none of which has really been realized according to the plan and 60% of them have been aborted hsdsmartboard.com