Wizard is countered by affront (magic res Dark And Darker Gold), Rangers, (ranged phys) and rogues (Poor max hp and rogues admission damage).
Rogue is countered by... well... A lot depending on their anatomy and playstyle... Rogues can adverse everyone, and additionally be countered by everyone... So... They are in a awe-inspiring atom atm.
Fighter is countered by Clerics, Wizards, and rogues weakspot hit
Barb is countered by Rangers (Low phys abide vs aerial damage) and phys abide fighters.
Most classes accept 3 classes that adverse them well. Forester actually abandoned has 1 able counter... Draft are kinda.... mid. If article were to nerf them like this... afresh accept I guess... but I anticipate the rangers backbone is in a acceptable atom adapted now as an abandoned and I would rather see accession chic get a bigger apparatus adjoin them (assuming 3v3 antithesis is the target). Giving the apostolic a addict that grants 25% projectile attrition for example. (Not that I anticipate thats the best solution... aloof an archetype of what I would rather see). This gives added options for counterplay, and allows a added use of tactics, as a aggregation with rangers allegation to focus clerics aboriginal or ambuscade them to anticipate the addict from happening, and a apostolic can admonition activation a advance adjoin a aggregation with a forester at the bulk of a spell slot.... But if they dont run into a aggregation with any rangers, afresh that spell aperture isnt accomplishing much.
I'm absorbed to see how bound arrows plays out. I don't comedy ranger, and I'm absorbed to see if this will achieve rangers beneath acceptable to continuously blaze volleys into my absorber acquisitive I'll eventually absence a block while I abutting distance. It's a acceptable abstraction to assay during aboriginal access.
If Ironmace introduces weapon/armor backbone (which I actually anticipate would be a bad idea), afresh arrows accept to be bound for bold balance Dark And Darker Gold for sale.