As for the woman she is recognized as having no sexual desire so it is not a problem whether she has no desire or not Later shortly after some of the readers of this book entered the world the state of society changed and the attitude of most people towards the subject of sex became more open so some people began to consult the doctor and asked him to talk about some principles that everyone could abide by on the issue of abstinence As a result there metal racking systems are many general and vague statements that abstinence is harmless which can be said to be meaningless and can be used arbitrarily For example some Taoists and the like advocate the birth of children outside for the need to carry on the family line outside a person can do no desire In other words only two or three degrees of sexual intercourse in a lifetime is enough This kind of moralist can take advantage of this statement and be complacent There is no doubt that the use of the joints of the muscular and endocrine systems in general is not harmful to health nor is the use of the muscles and endocrine glands in connection with sexual function However this kind of statement of abstinence is not very literal and mystifying and people in the medical profession who know a little about self-respect and self-respect are disdainful of doing it Therefore as time goes on this specious effort falls into the hands of quacks and quack doctors
The general public lacks sexual knowledge that is they have a smattering of knowledge and most of them are traditional views which become the tools of this kind of quacks to collect money The real doctor is prepared to deal with the actual case whether it is the prevention of the disease before it happens or the treatment of the disease already he is in contact with some lively men and women not some abstract or rigid provisions This level is now understood by many people and in recent years since the concept of sexual morality is not as rigid as before how to deal with the problem of abstinence is much more active than before and is not limited to a stereotyped answer In the past people estimated the harm of abstinence either too much or too little On the one hand some people think that the difficulty and harm of abstinence is too small to mention and they do not hesitate to tell people Most of these people belong to the category of moralists referred to in this article Their interest in morality is really too strong What they worry about day and night is that people's hearts are not ancient and the world is declining On the other hand there are people who think that all kinds of madness all kinds of mental disorders are caused by desire Although part of such an extreme view is related to some ancient legends industrial racking systems part of it is not the response caused by the views of Taoists As far as we know in congenitally healthy people it seems that only the end of abstinence will not lead to any serious mental illness or neuropathy It is a very common mistake to regard the relationship before and after as the relationship between cause and effect On the other hand it is equally illogical for us to attribute the source of the disease to the sexual impulse if a person who has been indulging in prostitution all his life later suffers from this disease Freud said in 1908 "Most of the elements that organize our society as far as their innate temperament is concerned are unworthy of asceticism" However he went on to say something very significant and worth remembering "Abstinence can cause great difficulties but there must be a prerequisite that is the existence of a congenital tendency to neuropathy and the result of abstinence is inevitably to cause neuropathy especially the so-called melancholic neuropathy (anxiety neu rosis)" Later in his introductory lectures he added "We must be careful not to take too seriously the influence of abstinence on neuropathy" Only a small part of the pathogenic state caused by the accumulation of sexual desire over a long period of time can be alleviated by sexual intercourse that can be obtained at one's fingertips or paid for
As we all know Freud has never underestimated the significance of sexual impulse to life so his testimony is particularly valuable It is also worth noting the fact that most Catholic priests are in excellent neurological health and rarely suffer from difficulties or pain due to abstinence Lowenfeld who had a great deal of experience on the subject and had studied it with an impartial eye also made this point and so did his conclusion His explanation was that perhaps there was no difficulty because the priest's virginity had been cultivated from childhood We should also remember that life is an art The secret of this art is to maintain the balance of two opposite and complementary forces One is expansion which is now called inhibition and the other is relaxation which is now called expression or development Restraint in a broad sense rather than in the narrow sense sometimes understood by psychoanalysts is also a central fact of life and its place is not in expression At the same time we are always there to suppress one part of the impulse and express another part of the impulse Inhibition itself is not harmful but beneficial Because it is a prerequisite for expression If we do not suppress the former how can we express the latter Restraint is not a characteristic peculiar to civilized life but it is equally remarkable automated warehouse systems in the more primitive ages It is easy to observe even in animals Since inhibition is such a natural thing it can be inferred that it is not harmful to life in general Of course there are also maladies that can not be properly suppressed especially for those who are born with shallow endowments and are not good at harmonious adjustment in both physical and mental aspects But these are the exceptions kingmoreracking.com