Because no matter this opinion, this remains 100 percent a company and marketing maneuver. If they truly wanted to do something positive, they can do it without marketing their merchandise while doing so. As it's not genuine. This is no different than the Mut 21 coins coronavirus advertisements. They could have said nothing at all. That is good. Solidarity or they realize a nice chunk of their audience is preoccupied with something more important than a damn videogame? Man. These comments really emphasize the nihilistic character of reddit users. Yes, this really is a company. Yes, it's something to do with marketing. However, Jesus, can not we be glad that companies are saying something? Do you not understand how much of an impact this could create? If the firm ignored the circumstance, it might give every checked out mind the concept that what's happening is ordinary and regular.
EA does not care for people that aren't investors. Eliminating Kaepernick's name out of songs in Madden 2 years in a row reveals it. Businesses don't need you to defend them, let their attorneys do that work. But we shouldn't praise a company for attaining the absolute bare minimum. You aren't trendy and moral for thanking corporations for not spitting on you. We ought to praise firms who show patterns of pleasure. Feel free to disagree, but don't behave like this specific case is this incredibly complicated morally-grey situation. I mean I believed there were fairly strict regulations on whose names and likeliness can be used in Madden. Just like Belicheck and Payton are not in Madden since they are not part of the NFLCA and that is who EA has a contract with. They may have to pay Kap if his title is used and are probably avoiding that. That and Kap isn't exactly welcome from the NFL world (not speaking about fans) anymore.
They both backpeddled and apologized when they were called out. They do not have rights to Kap's likeness in the game but they could cite him in the song (as they have with plenty of additional public figures in other songs). The fact that they did this 2 years in a row suggests it was not an innocent oversight but a real choice to collaborate with a fundamentally racist act of collusion within the NFL. I'm not defending a company. I am not saying EA is some bastion of social justice. Most people in general (not merely reddit) can't see past black and white. Cynicism inspires outrage and outrage inspires clicks. That is why negativity floats to the best in all social media. Cynicism inspires outrage and outrage inspires more clicks. That's why negativity floats to the top in most social websites. This is a significant element. Youtube for one has done research, since it's a massive part of their business and they would like to understand it. There has been testimony to congress about it I've watched but can not find at this time. What they need is engagement and the more negatively framed something is that the more folks will click it as it comes up on your own recommendations.
Businesses don't need you to defend them, let their lawyers do that work. "Firms do not need one to defend them", but somehow attacking companies when they are doing the right thing is necessary and productive?It does not matter whether it is for PR reasons, they're still increasing awareness to this issue and hurting nobody by doing this procedure. Meanwhile the men and women who see this as an chance to attack are just perpetuating a negative feeling of constant whining. It is not so much about"defending companies" but about attacking this naturally negativity. So you are really only adding to the man's argument by doing exactly what he described. They are not doing anything though. They just published a statement filled with cheap Madden nfl 21 coins empty rhetoric. You understand what doing something is? Not creating another Madden game because the NFL punished players like Kaepernick for taking a knee. That would be impressive. However, we are all aware that's not what's going to happen.